{"id":154,"date":"2007-05-18T15:47:23","date_gmt":"2007-05-18T19:47:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mat.tepper.cmu.edu\/blog\/?p=145"},"modified":"2007-05-18T15:47:23","modified_gmt":"2007-05-18T19:47:23","slug":"145","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mat.tepper.cmu.edu\/blog\/index.php\/2007\/05\/18\/145\/","title":{"rendered":"Quantum Computing and Learning from Blogs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/scottaaronson.com\/scott2.jpg\" title=\"Scott Aaronson\" alt=\"Scott Aaronson\" align=\"left\" height=\"195\" hspace=\"5\" width=\"143\" \/>Ever since I heard about quantum computing (it arose in the 1970s, but most of the really visible stuff started in the mid 1980s, see the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Timeline_of_quantum_computing\">Wiki timeline<\/a>), I have been skeptical.  This skepticism arose from a view that quantum computers could solve NP-complete problems in polynomial time.  I was randomly wandering the blogosphere when I can across &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/scottaaronson.com\/blog\/\">Shtetl-Optimized<\/a>&#8221; by <a href=\"http:\/\/scottaaronson.com\/\">Scott Aaronson<\/a>, with the subtitle &#8220;Quantum computers are not known to be able to solve NP-complete problems in polynomial time&#8221;.  Well, perhaps everyone else knew that, but it was somewhat annoying that something I <em>knew<\/em> for two decades was dead wrong.  While practical quantum computers still seem some time away (it seems the state of the art is factoring 15=3\u00d75), trying to determine the effect of quantum computing on OR seems like an interesting question.<\/p>\n<p>One post of Scott&#8217;s that I like very much is his &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/scottaaronson.com\/blog\/?p=231\">The Hiring Scott Aaronson FAQ<\/a>&#8220;, where he lists some of the questions he was asked in his job search (he is a postdoc at my alma mater, the University of Waterloo&#8217;s Department of Combinatorics and Optimization).  I&#8217;ve interviewed for a job or two in the couple years this blog has been going, but I have not been bold enough to talk about it.   Scott uses the entry as a very quick survey of what he believes in, and the interviewers don&#8217;t come across like idiots (I guess I would have asked about half the questions myself).<\/p>\n<p>Check out also his article &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scottaaronson.com\/papers\/npcomplete.pdf\">NP-Complete Problems and Physical Reality<\/a>&#8220;published a couple of years ago in the SIGACT News complexity column.  Having lived through an era when NP-completeness results were being churned out by the boatload with only a few providing real insight and advance (kinda like approximation results these days), I have not advanced very much beyond what I knew ten years ago, but Scott&#8217;s writing make this look pretty interesting again.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, I am jealous of Scott&#8217;s ability to write well enough and intriguingly enough to generate dozens of comments on each of his posts.  He points to the following review of his blog:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>OK, on to the second breakfast link.  Bill Gasarch has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cs.umd.edu\/%7Egasarch\/bookrev\/38-2.pdf\">reviewed my blog<\/a> for <em>SIGACT News<\/em> (scroll down to page 15), together with Lance Fortnow\u2019s and Luca Trevisan\u2019s.  Favorite quotes:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Lance is Walter Cronkite.  Scott is Stephen Colbert.<\/p>\n<p>The name of the blog, \u2018Shtetl-Optimized\u2019 does not really say what it is about. With this in mind one can never say Scott has gone \u2018off topic\u2019 since its [sic] not clear what the topic should be.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Perhaps I am sticking to the topic too much!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ever since I heard about quantum computing (it arose in the 1970s, but most of the really visible stuff started in the mid 1980s, see the Wiki timeline), I have been skeptical. This skepticism arose from a view that quantum computers could solve NP-complete problems in polynomial time. I was randomly wandering the blogosphere when &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/mat.tepper.cmu.edu\/blog\/index.php\/2007\/05\/18\/145\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Quantum Computing and Learning from Blogs&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-154","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blogs-and-web","category-research"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mat.tepper.cmu.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mat.tepper.cmu.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mat.tepper.cmu.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mat.tepper.cmu.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mat.tepper.cmu.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=154"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mat.tepper.cmu.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mat.tepper.cmu.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=154"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mat.tepper.cmu.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=154"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mat.tepper.cmu.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=154"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}