next up previous contents
Next: Decision Trees Up: Decision Theory Previous: Decision Theory

Decisions Under Risk

We make the assumption that there is more than one state of nature and that the decision maker knows the probability with which each state of nature will occur. Let tex2html_wrap_inline8772 be the probability that state j will occur. If the decision maker makes decision tex2html_wrap_inline8750 , her expected return tex2html_wrap_inline8778 is

displaymath8780

She will make the decision tex2html_wrap_inline8782 that maximizes tex2html_wrap_inline8778 , namely

displaymath8786

example3156

To solve this exercise, we first construct the payoff table. Here tex2html_wrap_inline8746 is the reward acheived when i papers are bought and a demand j occurs.

tex2html_wrap_inline8794

Next, we compute the expected returns for each possible decision:

eqnarray3172

The maximum occurs when the newsboy buys 2 papers from the delivery truck. His expected return is then 30 cents.

The fact that the newsboy must make his buying decision before demand is realized has a considerable impact on his revenues. If he could first see the demand being realized each day and then buy the corresponding number of newspapers for that day, his expected return would increase by an amount known as the expected value of perfect information. Millions of dollars are spent every year on market research projects, geological tests etc, to determine what state of nature will occur in a wide variety of applications. The expected value of perfect information indicates the expected gain from any such endeavor and thus places an upper bound on the amount that should be spent in gathering information.

Let us compute the expected value of perfect information EVPI for the above newsboy example. If demand were known before the buying decision is made, the newsboy's expected return would be

displaymath8798

displaymath8800

It should be pointed out that the criterion of maximizing expected return can sometimes produce unacceptable results. This is because it ignores downside risk. Most people are risk averse, which means they would feel that the loss of x dollars is more painful than the benefit obtained from the gain of the same amount. Decision theory deals with this problem by introducing a function that measures the ``attractiveness'' of money. This function is called the utility function. You are referred to 45-749 (managerial economics) for more on this notion. Instead of working with a payoff table containing the dollar amounts tex2html_wrap_inline8746 , one would instead work with a payoff table containing the utilities, say tex2html_wrap_inline8806 . The optimal decision tex2html_wrap_inline8782 is that which maximizes the expected utility

displaymath8810

over all i.


next up previous contents
Next: Decision Trees Up: Decision Theory Previous: Decision Theory

Michael A. Trick
Mon Aug 24 16:30:59 EDT 1998